Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Appl Acoust ; 199: 109037, 2022 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2031118

ABSTRACT

This study aims to investigate the typical noise levels and noise sources in an intensive care unit (ICU) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Acoustic experiments were conducted over 24 hrs in patient wards and at nurse stations in four Chinese hospitals. From the measurements, noise levels and sources were analysed in terms of the A-weighted equivalent sound pressure levels (L Aeq) and A-weighted maximum Fast time-weighted sound pressure levels (L AFmax) over three different time periods during the day (i.e. day, evening and night). Overall, noise levels (L Aeq) for 24 hrs in all hospitals exceeded the World Health Organisation's (WHO) guide levels, varying from 51.1 to 60.3 dBA. The highest maximum noise level reached 104.2 dBA. The single-bedded wards (side rooms) were quieter than multi-bedded wards, and night time noise levels were quieter than daytime and evening across all hospitals. It was observed that the most dominant noise sources were talking/voices, door-closing, footsteps, and general activities (e.g. noise from cleaning equipment and cutlery sound). Footsteps became an unexpected dominant noise source during the pandemic because of the staff's disposable shoe covers which made footsteps noisier. Patient alarms and coughing varied significantly between patients. Talking/voices produced the highest maximum median values of the sound exposure level (SEL) and the maximum noise level at all sites. Noise levels in all the patient rooms were more than the WHO guidelines. The pandemic control guidelines had little impact on the noise levels in the ICUs.

2.
Br J Gen Pract ; 72(721): 368-369, 2022 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1988085
3.
BMJ Open ; 11(12): e051561, 2021 12 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1583103

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Exploration of the factors that influence hospital doctors' antibiotic prescribing decisions when treating children with respiratory symptoms in UK emergency departments. METHODS: A qualitative study using semistructured interviews based on a critical incident technique with 21 physicians of different grades and specialties that treat children in the UK. Interviews were audio-recorded then transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Four themes were identified. These themes illustrate factors which influence clinician prescribing. The three principal themes were authorities, pressures and risk. The fourth transcending theme that ran through all themes was clinician awareness and complicity ('knowing but still doing'). CONCLUSIONS: Hospital doctors prescribe antibiotics even when they know they should not. This appears to be due to the influence of those in charge or external pressures experienced while weighing up the immediate and longer term risks but clinicians do this with full insight into their actions. These findings have implications for invested parties seeking to develop future antimicrobial stewardship programmes. It is recommended that stewardship interventions acknowledge and target these themes which may in turn facilitate behaviour change and antimicrobial prescribing practice in emergency departments.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Antimicrobial Stewardship , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Child , Emergency Service, Hospital , Humans , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Qualitative Research , United Kingdom
5.
BMJ ; 371: m4089, 2020 10 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-889883
6.
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol ; 319(3): L408-L415, 2020 09 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-646985

ABSTRACT

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a genetic disease caused by mutations in the CFTR gene. Although viral respiratory tract infections are, in general, more severe in patients with CF compared with the general population, a small number of studies indicate that SARS-CoV-2 does not cause a worse infection in CF. This is surprising since comorbidities including preexisting lung disease have been reported to be associated with worse outcomes in SARS-CoV-2 infections. Several recent studies provide insight into why SARS-CoV-2 may not produce more severe outcomes in CF. First, ACE and ACE2, genes that play key roles in SARS-CoV-2 infection, have some variants that are predicted to reduce the severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Second, mRNA for ACE2 is elevated and mRNA for TMPRSS2, a serine protease, is decreased in CF airway epithelial cells. Increased ACE2 is predicted to enhance SARS-CoV-2 binding to cells but would increase conversion of angiotensin II, which is proinflammatory, to angiotensin-1-7, which is anti-inflammatory. Thus, increased ACE2 would reduce inflammation and lung damage due to SARS-CoV-2. Moreover, decreased TMPRSS2 would reduce SARS-CoV-2 entry into airway epithelial cells. Second, many CF patients are treated with azithromycin, which suppresses viral infection and lung inflammation and inhibits the activity of furin, a serine protease. Finally, the CF lung contains high levels of serine protease inhibitors including ecotin and SERPINB1, which are predicted to reduce the ability of TMPRSS2 to facilitate SARS-CoV-2 entry into airway epithelial cells. Thus, a variety of factors may mitigate the severity of SARS-CoV-2 in CF.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus/pathogenicity , Coronavirus Infections/etiology , Cystic Fibrosis/virology , Inflammation/virology , Pneumonia, Viral/etiology , COVID-19 , Cystic Fibrosis/metabolism , Epithelial Cells/virology , Humans , Inflammation/metabolism , Lung/metabolism , Lung/virology , Pandemics , Peptidyl-Dipeptidase A/metabolism , SARS-CoV-2
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL